Frame from World's First Human-Powered Ornithopter Plays with YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

World's First Human-Powered Ornithopter

Open on YouTube First HN thread

1 HN user recommended this demo in 1 different month between 2012 and 2026.

2007–2026
1 strong recommendation 5 citations HackerTube score 1.5

Used as the real example of human-powered flapping flight, in contrast to hoaxes and other human-powered aircraft discussions.

A short clip of the Snowbird, a human-powered ornithopter built by University of Toronto students. On August 2, 2010 it sustained altitude and airspeed for 19.3 seconds, the first such flight.

Pull quote: “real science/engineering awesomeness like this” (HN, 2012)

Also tagged: human-powered ornithopter, ornithopter, human-powered flight, aviation, engineering, university of toronto

What Hacker News said

6 labeled comments from the HN archive; up to 20 are kept per video, favoring different commenters. Each one links back to the original thread.

Strongly recommends knowtheory March 2012 under ‘Bird Man’ Hoaxster Comes Clean on Dutch Television
Real science and engineering awesomeness versus a hoax.
Read the full comment
Why not deride the film maker? The problem i have with him is the same problem that i have with all liars. Namely, that the world is such an interesting and fascinating place, that wasting time on hoaxes and stupid "ha ha! i tricked you!" sorts of media is largely pointless. This dude can claim that his effort was really an "experiment" about online media and how to tell a story, but frankly, I think that's bullshit. This guy isn't doing research about what it takes a viral video to study viral videos so that society might better understand how it is that information is passed between members of a network (and there are folks who study this sort of thing). This dude is just trying to make a project of his go viral. I really see very little distinction between this project and any other sort of fame-whoring, save for the amount of effort put in. So, please tell me if you can, why this hoax is an improvement, or even a useful fiction in the face of real science/engineering awesomeness like this: [this video]

Citations, criticism and jokes

Cites it katovatzschyn March 2012 under Man Supposedly Flies With Custom-Built Bird Wings
Real human-powered flapping flight by engineers over years.
The disregard for the physics of the situation is actually quite insulting. The "demonstration" is so far from realistic its not even worth a debunking. Here is an example of what this man is claiming to have done, actually being done, by a team of engineers working for years: [this video]
Cites it 6ren March 2012 under Man Supposedly Flies With Custom-Built Bird Wings
Comparison: a human-powered articulated wing.
Conceptually plausible: the cyclic motion of articulated wings (flapping) seems understood in models e.g. [link] Jarno's idea of a powered exoskeleton wing to provide x20 power is right in principle, but needs light batteries: Prof Otten [link] As comparison, a human-powered articulated wing: [this video] A non-articulated wing [link] (18km) And the famous Gossamer Albatross flew from England to France [link] Also [link] To the downvoters: haters gonna hate, hackers gonna hack
Cites it yurisagalov May 2012 under Atlas: A Human-Powered Helicopter
Same team set a Guinness record with a human-powered ornithopter.
This project is from the same team that recently set the Guinness World Record by building a Human Powered Ornithopter ( [this video] )
Cites it pygy_ May 2012 under Atlas: A Human-Powered Helicopter
Shows sustained altitude and speed for nearly 20 seconds.
> Where is the difference to a glider? It sustained altitude and speed for a while (short of 20 seconds). See this: [this video]

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video in a list
Enter
Open the focused video
l
Like (on a video page)
w
Watch later (on a video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close