2 HN users recommended this talk2 months2017–2019score 2
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Recommended as a broad, practical view of AI's near-term impact from a leading practitioner, with his argument that worrying about evil AI is premature.
Andrew Ng speaks at the Stanford MSx Future Forum about how AI is transforming industry after industry, comparing its impact to electricity. The talk also touches on evil-AI worries, jobs and basic income.
I really enjoyed this Andrew Ng talk: [this video] Some excerpts: Anti-Evil AI drives funding: [this video] Radiologist will be impacted: [this video] Against Basic Income: [this video] Trolley Problem (who dies): [this video]
Ng talk on evil AI, radiologists, basic income, trolley problem
> It is hard for me to empathize with Musk’s fixation on evil super-intelligent AGI killer robots in a very distant future. This reminded me of a talk by Andrew Ng I watched recently [1]: "Worrying about evil AI robots today is a little bit like worrying about overpopulation on the planet Mars ... how do you not care ... and my answer is we haven't landed on the planet yet so I don't know how to work productively on that problem...of course, doing research on anti-evil AI is a positive thing but I do see that there is a massive misallocation of resources." Nice talk all around if you can find the time. [1] [this video]
The problem with worrying about the "Evil AI": [this video] Radiologist will be impacted: [this video] Against Basic Income: [this video] Trolley Problem (who dies): [this video]
Why should humans work in factories doing mindless jobs? We need to prepare people to re-educate themselves as technology advances. Andrew Ng discusses "basic income" where people need to learn: [this video]
>Andrew Ng once tweeted about a 1-second heuristic [..] And was summarily derided for it. Read the replies to his tweet to see some of the suggested counter examples. Fyi to add some extra context to that "1 sec heuristic"... I've seen several Andrew Ng presentations over the last several years and in the live talks, he has more of a lead up to that "1 second" idea[0]. He was trying to help project managers at Baidu think about the possibilities of new AI products to build. Unfortunately, the extreme brevity of that tweet removes all that surrounding context that so it makes him look like an AI crackpot instead of an AI realist. (E.g. The top tweet reply from Pedro Domingos seems to be based on the limitations of current AI but Andrew Ng was trying to convey the idea to PMs of what new AI to build.) [0] deep link at 12m20s for context and 14m05s is the "1 sec heuristic": [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes
Read more