HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Susan Crawford on Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry & Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Susan Crawford on Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry & Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age

Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society
Talks
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this talk3 months2013–2014 score 3
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Recommended in broadband and net neutrality threads as an overview of the US telecom monopoly problem.

Susan Crawford talks at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center about her book Captive Audience. She argues that deregulation and consolidation left a few telecom companies in control of American internet access, so people pay too much for slow service.

“It goes over the telecom industry, how it's not competitive and the current day incentives/problems.” (HN, 2014)

3 recommendations · 1 citations · Talks · partly dated

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@graedus Jan 2014 Recommends
on HN thread Net neutrality is half-dead: Court strikes down FCC’s anti-blocking rules
Because it's considered "vertical integration" and therefore not subject to anti-trust laws. Comcast merging with Time Warner would be considered horizontal; Comcast merging with NBCU was considered vertical and therefore allowed to go forward in January 2011. I'm currently reading Susan Crawford's book Captive Audience, which is a detailed history of this exact topic. Recommended. Here's a talk she gave at Harvard summarizing the story and issues at stake: [this video]
Crawford summarizes the history and stakes of telecom consolidation
@fossuser Feb 2014 Recommends
on HN thread Why is broadband more expensive in the US?
That's interesting (didn't know about the whole city coverage). The general telecom issue is also gone over well in this talk called captive audience [ [this video] ]. It goes over the telecom industry, how it's not competitive and the current day incentives/problems. While the underlying reason that this issue cannot easily be fixed appears to be related to a more fundamental problem with American campaign fundraising and how it creates a competing dependency that prevents any meaningful reform from moving forward. This Ted talk by Lawrence Lessig ( [link] ) gives a good overview of this problem.
Covers non-competitive telecom industry and its incentives

Citations, criticism and jokes

@fossuser Sep 2013 Cites it
on HN thread The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked
The ETF goes down, but so does the value of the phone - you're also paying off the difference in price every month. On Tmobile when you bring your own device you can get a $50 everything plan - the equivalent plan is $100 on competing networks. Granted you could argue this isn't all subsidy and that Tmobile is also cheaper because their network is worse, but when you compare to international cell services this doesn't appear to be the case. It's at least in part because the companies are near monopolies that don't need to compete ( [this video] ).

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close