HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from PFAS: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

PFAS: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

68 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
4 HN users recommended this commentary4 months2021–2025 score 4
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN points to it as a well-researched, accessible overview of PFAS in PFAS-related threads.

John Oliver's Last Week Tonight segment on PFAS, the 'forever chemicals' linked to health problems. It covers their widespread use in products like nonstick coatings and repellent fabrics and the limits of regulation.

“he does his homework” (HN, 2022)

4 recommendations · 2 citations · Commentary · partly dated

6 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@725686 Oct 2021 Recommends
on HN thread Why birds can fly over Mount Everest (2020)
Last week, on Last Week Tonight, John Oliver talks about PFAS, which was very interesting. Not only teflon, but all kind of repellent fabrics like Gore-tex: [this video]
Interesting segment on PFAS in teflon and repellent fabrics.
@LinuxBender Dec 2022 Recommends
on HN thread The U.S. military is poisoning Okinawa
I thought that too. There is a video by John Oliver talking about PFAS and the other hundred or so variants of these compounds. [1] There are other videos talking about how companies can still use these compounds because the EPA only outlawed about 3 of the 130 or so. [1] - [this video] [video]
Covers PFAS variants and limited EPA bans.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@bialpio Apr 2022 Cites it
on HN thread 3M tape with anisotropic z-axis electrical conductivity
Not sure if you'll consider this a more scientific source, but John Oliver also did a piece about PFAS: [this video] . The list of issues that the wiki article claims are "high certainty" is also quite concerning to me: [link] At the very least, seems that the production is being ramped down - quick skim of the article yielded this quote: "Their [PFASs'] production has been regulated or phased out by manufacturers, such as 3M, DuPont, Daikin, and Miteni in the US, Japan, and Europe."
John Oliver piece on PFAS.
@strogonoff May 2022 Cites it
on HN thread Shaving is an example of how consumer products extract more money
Read more
> Also, claiming that [PFAS] "seem to be poisonous" without any qualifiers is a little misleading. To my knowledge they're only poisonous during manufacturing (ie. the precursor chemicals) and when they get too hot. It’s a bit difficult to exactly measure the effects of PFAS and how much of it makes it poisonous—when a study sought a control group of people without any in their blood for a study, they were not able to find a single living person on this planet that fits the definition anymore—but even with what we know the author is likely significantly understating that particular point[0]. Even if we ignore the poison released into the environment during manufacturing, I am yet to see a used Teflon pan that has no scratches (and that’s just the ones visible with naked eye). Combine with the fact that non-Teflon pans are becoming nearly impossible to find in many retail stores, and it becomes somewhat concerning. [0] [this video]
Author likely understates PFAS risk.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close