Frame from Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer Plays with YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer

Open on YouTube First HN thread

11 HN users recommended this lecture in 11 different months between 2021 and 2026.

2007–2026
6 strong recommendations 7 recommendations HackerTube score 14

HN calls it mandatory viewing on the AGC, praising the speaker's enthusiasm and the clear account of restartable, robust software design.

Robert Wills of TNMoC explains the Apollo Guidance Computer hardware and software, then walks through the Apollo 11 landing procedure step by step, including the 1202 alarms.

Pull quote: “The guy is really, really into it and it just makes the presentation amazing.” (HN, 2022)

Also tagged: apollo guidance computer, apollo 11, agc, 1202 alarm, spaceflight software, computer history

What Hacker News said

13 labeled comments from the HN archive; up to 20 are kept per video, favoring different commenters. Each one links back to the original thread.

Strongly recommends isolli March 2024 under NASA engineers make progress toward understanding Voyager 1 issue
Walks through landing procedure and robust software design.
I can't recommend a book, but I watched this video a while ago, and I found it riveting: "Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer" [0] > Robert Wills introduces the amazing hardware and software that made up the Apollo Guidance Computer, walks you through the landing procedure step-by-step, and talks about the pioneering design principles that were used to make the landing software robust against any failure. [0] [this video]
Apollo computer's careful engineering: wired software, error correction, restartability.
A bit offtopic but I recently saw a surprisingly interesting talk about the Apollo board computer[0], and it's incredible how carefully they engineered the whole thing. Software hardcoded in the wiring, error correction for every memory access, ability to restart the whole system in any situation without losing state...this thing might have been rudimentary in today's standards, but the quality of the software was a different beast. [0] [this video]
Recommends tatoalo August 2022 under The Apollo On-Board Computers
Talk on the 1202 alarm with a great presenter.
In addition to the fantastic ccc.de talk, I suggest this one related to the 1202 alarm: [this video] Great talk and overall super presenter IMHO.
Walkthrough of operation and cause of the 1202 error.
Here's another lecture I really enjoyed walking through the operation of the guidance computer and the events that lead to the 1202 error, which the speaker sums up as an "out of memory" error resulting in an automatic reboot. He says the cause was a hardware bug taxing the machine with empty status updates, combined with Buzz typing "verb 16 noun 68" to have the display auto-update some stats - he was crashing the machine but didn't put together why it was happening because it never crashed the machine in simulation. [this video]
Recommends leetrout November 2023 under The Apollo Guidance Computer
Great talk on the AGC by Robert Wills.
Theres a great video of a talk on the AGC from Robert Wills at England's The National Museum of Computing [this video] More info and links to other videos on [link]
Recommends mulmen November 2023 under Starship Integrated Flight Test 2 at 7 Am Central Time
Great video on the AGC and the Apollo 11 landing.
Read the full comment
> Apollo 11 had problems with the LM guidance computer, but was saved by Neil Armstrong's piloting skill. This is a common misconception but mixes up at least three things. 1) Yes, Eagle was long, but not because of a software bug. The exact reason is unclear and there may have been multiple factors. 2) Yes, there were unexpected computer alarms but these were caused by a hardware bug that manifested because a switch was in an unexpected position. The software handled this appropriately. Margaret Hamilton said: “To blame the computer for the Apollo 11 problems is like blaming the person who spots a fire and calls the fire department. Actually, the computer was programmed to do more than recognize error conditions. A complete set of recovery programs was incorporated into the software. The software's action, in this case, was to eliminate lower priority tasks and re-establish the more important ones. The computer, rather than almost forcing an abort, prevented an abort. If the computer hadn't recognized this problem and taken recovery action, I doubt if Apollo 11 would have been the successful Moon landing it was.” 3) Neil Armstrong did adjust the landing point late in the descent after noticing rough terrain. He utilized semi-automatic control to do this. Essentially adjusting the target point for the autopilot. Eagle wasn’t directly flown like an aircraft. [link] A great video on the AGC and Apollo 11 landing: [this video]
Recommends pangratz August 2024 under Experience the Apollo 11 Lunar Landing
Story of the onboard computer.
I love the calm communications. The feeling of everything possible thought out. Regarding moon landing videos, I also enjoyed the "story" of the computer on board which is told in this great presentation [1]: Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer by Robert Wills. Definitely worth a watch if you fancy the moon landing. [1]: [this video]

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video in a list
Enter
Open the focused video
l
Like (on a video page)
w
Watch later (on a video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close