Cited on HN 7 times, 2019–2026, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN uses it as the standard debunking to cite whenever a new water-from-air device is announced.
Thunderf00t critiques the MIT and Berkeley metal-organic framework device that claims to pull water from air using only solar heating. He argues the energy accounting does not work and that such devices are essentially fancy dehumidifiers.
“The TLDW version is these devices are fancy dehumidifiers.” (HN, 2022)
These dehumidifiers produce half a liter a day and need around 72 watt which is maybe 1€ per liter drinking water for my area The tech is cool but not really new or a solution to all water problems, the energy cost is relatively high. More about it here: [this video]
> Crystalline nets harvest water from desert air, turn carbon dioxide into liquid fuel It's like we are stacking crazy, onto crazy, onto crazy. You can't get water from air in deserts or places needing water of any practical, non military use - Here's a start - [this video] We don't need to turn CO2 into fuel, just make fuel/energy without fossil fuels that's also used, and you're solving global warming in a amazing way. It's worth trillions, so it's always AMAZING to see some school kid or amateur scientist or researcher who just needs a little more research beat the multi nationals. It's a shame the multi nationals are to dumb to not hire school kids and these smart ideas people. Just shitty people who spend years studying at university then years working in the industry doing hard work to gradually make change.
Nope, there's no magic or free lunch. It depends heavily on local conditions which might not always be suitable. Thunderf00t has debunked a bunch of other enterprises doing water from the air: [link] [link] [this video] [link] etc
Thanks for the links! Mostly scams and very bad science journalism indeed. However, he completely misses the mark in his video about the Science paper "Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight" [1]. He declares it a hoax, but ignores pretty much everything from the paper. Surprisingly, far down the comment section, there is a comment explaining that [2]. [1] [link] [2] [this video]
None. Or alternatively, gathering Reddit/HN karma or channeling NGO funds into overpriced useless science projects instead of helping people. Thunderf00t has made a ton of videos about devices like this, for example: [this video] The TLDW version is these devices are fancy dehumidifiers. They need a ton of power, and lots of air humidity to be practical, which are exactly not the conditions these devices are advertised to operate in. And even then, the water they produce is dirty, so it needs to be purified and treated to be actually drinkable. Even if we solve all these challenges, it turns out that doing something dumb and low tech, like transporting drinking water on trucks is actually a lot more efficient. This is another one in the long list of devices designed to help those hypothetical poor people, like OLPC and the Gravity Light. It turns out these people have already solved these issues, and much better, usually with off-the-shelf alternatives and a bit of ingenuity.
You can wear silica gel since about 1918 - only needs some heat to get the water out and cold to condense it. Then again, why would you want to wear your dehumidifier (ok ok water harvester)? Is it for excursions into damp areas, so that you can then return to your dry home to extract water? Then, I believe everything in this video still applies. [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
7 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more