HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia

49 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this talk3 months2019–2020 score 4
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN commenters credit it with changing their minds on nuclear power and cite it for the downsides of renewables.

Michael Shellenberger argues in a TEDx talk that solar and wind need huge amounts of land and mining, and says nuclear power is a better path to protecting both the climate and nature.

“it's what changed my mind and therefore in my opinion the best delivery of the argument I'm aware of.” (HN, 2019)

2 strong recommendations · 1 recommendations · 2 citations · Talks · partly dated

5 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@mikemotherwell May 2019 Strongly recommends
on HN thread In Australia, Coal Remains King
> Australia, with it's plentiful sunshine and wide open spaces It's funny, but that sounds an AWFUL lot like the Terra Nullius argument used to disposes Indigenous people of their land. Australia's "wide open spaces" are home to flora and fauna that are unique and worth preserving. The idea we'd want vast swaths of solar destroying the natural environment - one that is unique and wonderful - is odd to me. [this video] really changed my mind on this. I was pro-nuclear before seeing it, but am even more so after.
Strengthened the commenter's pro-nuclear view.
@0xfaded Sep 2019 Strongly recommends
on HN thread Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to complex molecules
Read more
I recently watched a TED talk which changed my opinion of renewables from "maybe" to "no". Basically he argues that solar and wind are low density energy sources that require significant resources to capture, which all become waste after 25 years. Meanwhile we have nuclear which provides consistent base load, and for very good reasons we have gotten good at containing all the waste/pollution produced. I'm now of the opinion we should be on a sprint towards fusion, investing heavily in other nuclear technologies, e.g. thorium, along the way. Sorry to leave a video link, but it's what changed my mind and therefore in my opinion the best delivery of the argument I'm aware of. [this video]
Argues solar and wind are low density; favors nuclear.
@kinjba1 Aug 2020 Recommends
on HN thread Air pollution is worse than we thought
No energy source [that we've discovered so far] is perfect. All have downsides. Sadly, living in denial of that fact is more popular than ever, but that's a separate topic. Here are a couple TED talks showing the downside of renewable energy - such as the enormous land usage and reliable energy storage needed to compete with nuclear or fossil. Why renewables can’t save the planet [this video] A reality check on renewables [link]
Downsides of renewables such as land use and storage.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@nestorD Apr 2019 Cites it
on HN thread The Third Phase of Clean Energy Will Be Most Disruptive Yet
Watching the following TED talk, I was surprised to discover that gas compagny such as Total are actually promoting renewable energies because they currently need to be complemented and gas is the main solution used for that purpose. [this video]
Gas companies promote renewables since gas complements them.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close