Do you track yourself? Do you check, what you are reading, and verify your own progress? Some time ago I started thinking about my problems with Google search, and was inspired by other project to write a program for myself. Throughout my life I have found many resources worthy of my time, but which I have lost, or forgotten about. I wanted to change that. I wanted to be able to look back. I have started my project in Sept of 2023. The core functionality is: to store, browse, and search for links. Additionally I added RSS sources as sources, so every hour I ping sources to check if there is anything new, and I expand my database. Does that replace Google search? Nope. On the other hand it expanded my horizons. I found most of RSS aggregators lacking: - some provides ability to bookmark entries, but some do not allow to insert links manually - some do not provide ability to tag links - some are on-line, and I strongly prefer local NAS web apps - most do not provide clean ability to search link database (as it may involve heavy operations) I found Google search lacking: - 10 pages each with 10 links for a searched keywords is not enough. If I write 'covid' into google search I would be expecting millions of links in results, from variety of sources. Even Fox news, even daily mail - I have results curated by big tech, I prefer to curate output myself What I have found about archive.org: - it is slow and unreliable - does not store RSS sources often enough - author of RSS program
Fighting with formatting... Do you track yourself? Do you check, what you are reading, and verify your own progress? Some time ago I started thinking about my problems with Google search, and was inspired by other project to write a program for myself. Throughout my life I have found many resources worthy of my time, but which I have lost, or forgotten about. I wanted to change that. I wanted to be able to look back. I have started my project in Sept of 2023. The core functionality is: to store, browse, and search for links. Additionally I added RSS sources as sources, so every hour I ping sources to check if there is anything new, and I expand my database. Does that replace Google search? Nope. On the other hand it expanded my horizons. I found most of RSS aggregators lacking: - some provides ability to bookmark entries, but some do not allow to insert links manually - some do not provide ability to tag links - some are on-line, and I strongly prefer local NAS web apps - most do not provide clean ability to search link database (as it may involve heavy operations) I found Google search lacking: - 10 pages each with 10 links for a searched keywords is not enough. If I write 'covid' into google search I would be expecting millions of links in results, from variety of sources. Even Fox news, even daily mail - I have results curated by big tech, I prefer to curate output myself What I have found about archive.org: - it is slow and unreliable - does not store RSS sources often en
> PS I was reading (sceptically) 'google search is broken' already for a year or so in HN comments and have to admit I believe it now. Even ignoring results, mainstream started to notice a while ago. Perhaps the biggest social proof at large is when it is shown distilled as comedy and people can laugh about it: [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
4 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more