HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from DEFCON 21 - DNS May Be Hazardous to Your Health - Robert Stucke Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

DEFCON 21 - DNS May Be Hazardous to Your Health - Robert Stucke

Robert Stucke (bobhex)
Talks
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this talk1 month2013–2016 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited in threads on ECC memory, CPU reliability, and bitsquatting as evidence that bit flips cause real DNS misdirection.

A DEFCON 21 talk by Robert Stucke on DNS errors caused by single-bit flips, which lead to requests for misspelled domains. It shows real-world data on bitsquatting.

“you might find the DEFCON talk on single bit domain errors relevant” (HN, 2013)

1 recommendations · 3 citations · Talks · intermediate

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@aimhb Dec 2013 Recommends
on HN thread CPU reliability – Linus Torvalds (2007)
It was posted here on HN a few days ago, but you might find the DEFCON talk on single bit domain errors relevant: [this video] In summary, some data centers are run hotter than recommended, which leads to a lot of mostly ignored domain resolution errors, which leads to a security risk.
Talk on single-bit domain errors from hot data centers.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@vezzy-fnord Dec 2013 Cites it
on HN thread Is Unicode Safe?
The homoglyph attack is a very old and often abused technique. A related, though not identical one, is bit flipping where a single character is swapped in a domain name and you prey on those who make misspellings. It turns out, however, that it isn't even necessary for someone to make a blatant error like that... [this video] [DEFCON 21: DNS May Be Hazardous To Your Health]
DEFCON talk on bit-flip domain misspellings.
@vox_mollis Nov 2015 Cites it
on HN thread To ECC or Not to ECC
This cannot possibly be right. There was a DC21 talk regarding DNS request misfires due to bit flips in non-ECC DRAM, and the researcher was able to collect a surprisingly large number of requests on the basis of this. Edit: found it: [this video]
Talk showing DNS misfires from non-ECC bit flips.
@voltagex_ Aug 2016 Cites it
on HN thread Flip Feng Shui: A new cross-VM exploitation vector
>We have registered all possible domains that are one bit flip away from ubuntu.com and debian.org. We would like to hand these domains over to the correct authority. Please get in touch if you think you are one. Aha! [link] is a talk about "bitsquatting" along the same lines. I'm sure I've seen a newer talk about it too Edit: [this video] is the other video, which also looks at the behaviour of various clients
Talk on bitsquatting and client behaviour.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close