Cited on HN 4 times, 2022–2026, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited as evidence that Betamax was not meaningfully better than VHS.
Technology Connections compares Betamax and VHS picture quality using footage from a 1979 RCA VCR and argues the Beta quality advantage was largely marketing.
“Technology Connections did a teardown of why Betamax wasn't better than VHS” (HN, 2025)
In tests done by Technology Connections, the difference was so small as to be inconsequential. It was technically better at its slowest speed, but you could barely perceive the difference and more importantly Sony disabled the feature in the vast majority of machines sold. People wanted more than 60 minutes out of one tape. They wanted 2 hours. [this video]
This just reminds me of the people who whine about Betamax (or CCS) being better. FWIW: Technology Connections did a teardown of why Betamax wasn't better than VHS: [this video] And the whole series if you actually enjoy watching these things: [link]
While a worse format surely could have won something like the video wars, it doesn't seem that VHS was in fact the worse format overall: [link] (Part 2: [link] . Quality comparison: [this video] ) Beta was basically optimised for one thing, reasonable cassette size, and the tradeoffs turned out probably not to be worth it.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
4 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.