HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from I Did Caffeine Analysis: Some Unexpected Results! Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

I Did Caffeine Analysis: Some Unexpected Results!

5 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this explainer1 month2023–2024 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited as measured evidence of how brew method affects caffeine content, notably that filter coffee extracts more than espresso.

James Hoffmann runs caffeine analyzer tests comparing filter versus espresso, extraction over time, steep time, instant coffee and light versus dark roast.

“Check out this James Hoffmann video specifically on this topic” (HN, 2024)

1 recommendations · 2 citations · Explainers

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@Kirby64 Feb 2024 Recommends
on HN thread High coffee consumption, brain volume and risk of dementia and stroke
Prep method matters so much though. For comparison, a standard double shot of espresso is typically 18g of coffee. This would yield approximately 110mg of caffeine. By comparison, the same 18g brewed using a pour over method should yield an 8oz cup of coffee with … likely around 170mg of caffeine. Check out this James Hoffmann video specifically on this topic: [this video]
Analysis of how brew method changes caffeine content

Citations, criticism and jokes

@FirmwareBurner Aug 2023 Cites it
on HN thread Espresso Coffee Mitigates the Aggregation of Alzheimer′s Associated Tau Protein
Not necessarily true, filter extracts more caffeine than espresso at the same soluble extraction levels: [this video] The truth is there is not enough scientific research to compare all brewing methods. Espresso uses high pressure but very short brew times, but filter uses more water and longer brew times therefore the coffee comes out totally different, and that's before we even talk about different grind sizes and roast levels.
Measurement showing filter coffee extracts more caffeine than espresso
@aphantastic Dec 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Humans are unreliable models of mouse disease
1 cup filter coffee can be 170mg or more. And LD50 isn’t really relevant here, even LD1 levels are deadly to hundreds of millions of people. It’s entirely possible for what some might consider a “normal” amount of coffee to be deadly to many. See other comment for espresso calculations. [this video]
Cited for caffeine content of filter coffee versus espresso

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close