HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Barack Obama Singing Call Me Maybe by Carly Rae Jepsen Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Barack Obama Singing Call Me Maybe by Carly Rae Jepsen

baracksdubs
Comedy
YouTube
Cited on HN 3 times, 2012–2020, never outright recommended score 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN commenters cite it as a silly but clear example of how cutting and reordering real footage can fabricate meaning without any deepfake technology.

A 2012 parody dub that splices clips of Barack Obama speaking into a performance of Carly Rae Jepsen's 'Call Me Maybe'. It is a short comedic mashup built entirely from re-ordered snippets of his real speech.

“you might be surprised at what can be accomplished with camera angles, choosing the start and end times of your clip, and cuts and reordering of clips” (HN, 2020)

3 citations · Comedy · partly dated

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@ChuckMcM Sep 2012 Cites it
on HN thread New Content-Delivery Tech Should Be Presumed Illegal, Says Former Copyright Boss
Read more
"We are now getting misleading Techdirt stories secondhand through Slashdot. It's interesting to see how far this game of telephone might go." You know when I was watching President Obama's cover of the hit single "Call me maybe" [1] I was thinking the same thing. Kidding aside though, the two things that the Youtube spoof and this have in common are taking snippets of actual "stuff" and mashing them together into something that the person making the mashup finds useful/amusing/entertaining. As HN and Reddit and slashdot before them seep into the journalistic consciousness there are pretty clear efforts to craft a message based on selective sampling. By drilling into the sources for all the clips (unnecessary of course but bear with me) used to compose the 'call me maybe' video its clear that the President never set out to make this video or even knew the lyrics (probably does now though :-) and this slashdot article appears to be a lesser instance of the same effect. Pull a few bits out of context, wrap them together into a choice sounding narrative and blam! you've got a "story." So to answer your question the 'telephone' you mention is simply 'spin doctoring' (to use the 20th century vernacular) and it will continue as long as people make long enough sound bytes in their communication that they can be re-purposed for spin without setting off too many alarms in the readership. [1] [this video]
Used as analogy for selective sampling of clips creating misleading narratives.
@aliakhtar Nov 2016 Cites it
on HN thread Adobe Voco 'Photoshop-for-voice' causes concern
> I'm sure with a lot of dedication any amateur can already collect enough unique sounds and and snippets from prominent people to fake sentences [this video]
Example of splicing snippets of a prominent person's speech to fake sentences.
@JoshuaDavid Aug 2020 Cites it
on HN thread Stopping deepfake news with an AI algorithm that can tell when a face doesnt fit
Read more
While video is currently unlikely to be entirely fabricated at this point, you might be surprised at what can be accomplished with camera angles, choosing the start and end times of your clip, and cuts and reordering of clips: for a silly example of this, see "Obama sings Call Me Maybe"[1]. Videos can also be staged with varying levels of convincingness. If you are digging for evidence, the source of your information must be taken into account. Deepfakes will probably be detectable in retrospect, even if they are not detectable at the time of publication, so if you stick with sources with a long history of only publishing real information, you're probably still fine even in the age of deepfakes. The arguable lack of journalistic sources with a demonstrated history of integrity is its own problem, but not one that is made significantly worse by the presence of deepfakes. [1] [this video]
Silly example of how cuts and reordering fabricate meaning without deepfakes.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close