Cited on HN 4 times, 2016–2019, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited as a funny and effective real example of social engineering whenever support-desk account takeovers and human weak points are discussed.
A short clip demonstrating a phone-based social engineering trick in which a crying baby in the background is used to pressure a customer service rep. It shows how attackers exploit human sympathy rather than technical flaws.
“Here's a pretty hilarious and effective example where a crying baby background was used” (HN, 2018)
That sounds like a very tedious thing to go through to login to your email. Just use a strong password ( [link] ) The funny thing with having email as a username is, how sometimes people can use social engineering to gain control of your account, non of that fancy "hoaxer" stuff are needed when your service providers put untrained people in charge of your accounts. Hacking human stupidity is a more effective way in to get in to a secure system. ( as an example, this was on reddit just yesterday [this video] )
Example of social engineering to take over accounts
>Only if you define easier as 'badly designed process'. I'd be interested to know what a good process is. >That is unfortunate, but why do you believe this will always be the case? I don't believe most (if any) online accounts that I have provide enough profit to the service owner to hire and train employees with enough expertise, time, and resources to properly determine a valid recovery attempt from a fake one. Social engineering employees just seems so easy from what I've seen. It's so reliable it can be done on stage: [link] [this video] It just takes a single slip up and you lose. Whereas attackers can just keep trying. >Maybe this can be an opt-in for the more 'security-minded' minority. Yeah I agree it's a good idea. In fact that's what I've done on my primary google account [link] But that implementation isn't perfect, it requires giving up some features and buying U2F keys. Preferably you could opt into exactly the protection you want, so you could get the recovery security without having to buy security keys for example. I agree there could be better implementations, but they would cost more. I think it's a three way tradeoff between cost, easy recover, and security. When I hear someone advocating for easier recovery without advocating for higher cost, then I immediately think there will be a lowering of security.
Cellphone accounts can be readily compromised via social engineering (aka tricking the CSR into changing things). Here's a pretty hilarious and effective example where a crying baby background was used: [this video]
Hilarious example of tricking a CSR using a crying baby background
Social hacking is alive and well. During my studies in computer engineering we had lectures on cybersecurity and the person used the following example [this video] Human error is still one of the most popular hacking techniques. By getting an e-mail address you can check haveibeenpwnd to see if there were any leaks related to that e-mail address and there's already a lot that you have on a person that you don't actually know. Recently there was an increase in phishing schemes where hackers obtained the passwords of really old leaks (from myspace, armorgames etc. etc.) and sent letters to people with legit passwords trying to extort money. This was a hugely successful campaign. I'm not saying don't mention your name in public but for sure use a password manager and a VPN if you're on public wi-fi a lot. And don't shout your cred card number while buying coffee.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
4 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more