HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Dutch junction design - safer for cyclists Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Dutch junction design - safer for cyclists

7 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
Cited on HN 4 times, 2016–2022, never outright recommended score 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Linked as the go-to demonstration that the cyclist-versus-driver conflict at intersections is a solved design problem.

A short BicycleDutch episode showing how Dutch junctions with protected cycle paths are laid out. It argues these are proven, non-experimental designs that make intersections safer for cyclists.

“Well guess what, we've figured this out decades ago in the Netherlands” (HN, 2016)

4 citations · Explainers

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@vanderZwan Dec 2016 Cites it
on HN thread How Sweden Has Redesigned Streets to Route Around Bad Behavior
Read more
As a Dutchman living in Stockholm I can tell you one thing: they should fix their goddamn bike lanes. Sure, they have them, which makes them better than 90% of the rest of the world. They're still shit. There's no separation of car- and bike traffic. To turn left a cyclist first has to cross parallel car traffic, making this unsafer for cyclists (and annoying for the people in cars, for that matter). Key issues: - the cyclist and driver should meet at a (near) 90 degree angle, so neither requires eyes in the back of their head - separate the goddamn lanes so neither car nor cyclist feels uncomfortably close to the other - don't require extra space because every square meter counts in a big city Well guess what, we've figured this out decades ago in the Netherlands: [link] [this video] [link]
Dutch junction design solves cyclist-driver conflict.
@Muximize Jan 2021 Cites it
on HN thread The great bicycle boom of 2020
There's usually no need to yield, traffic signals regulate that. The idea here is to create a more forgiving environment where making mistakes is less likely and less harmful. Thousands of these intersections have been build, here's some examples and some US context and research: [this video] [link] [link]
Examples and US context of Dutch junctions.
@cletus May 2021 Cites it
on HN thread How I, as someone who is visually impaired, use my iPhone (2020)
This is mostly a good thing. I say "mostly" because it encourages scooter riders to use the sidewalk and pretty much anywhere I've been scooter-share riders are a public menace. One issue with these in NYC at least is the drainage just isn't designed for them. So anytime you get significant rain or snow melt you get pools of water that don't drain because the actual drains are elsewhere. If only the US could adopt Dutch junction design [1]. And don't get me started on the cyclist and pedestrian safety nightmare that is allowing people to turn right at red lights. [1]: [this video]
Dutch junction design as desired for US cities.
@NavinF Sep 2022 Cites it
on HN thread EV adoption in US is happening faster than predicted
That video doesn’t load for me, but I found a direct link: [this video] I’d love to avoid cutting into the bike lane (required for right turns in most of the US), but some of those intersections are massive and the rest (1:18 in the video) replace the sidewalk with a bike lane. I don’t think either of those will be popular in American cities.
Dutch junction with doubts about US adoption.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close