HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Andrew Price - Improving Blender's UI Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Andrew Price - Improving Blender's UI

6 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
2 HN users recommended this talk1 month2013–2017 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited as an example of how hard it is to reconcile UX views in open source communities, and as the start of a redesign discussion.

Andrew Price presents at the Blender conference on the problems, politics and possible fixes for Blender's user interface, followed by a full Q&A. He argues that an interface upgrade is overdue.

“Andrew Price explains better in his talk about Blender redesing than I could” (HN, 2017)

2 recommendations · 4 citations · Talks · intermediate · partly dated

6 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@sethrin Jan 2017 Recommends
on HN thread Inkscape Version 0.92 is Released
Mr. Price did some re-thinking and a follow-up presentation on that same subject, which is also interesting viewing. [this video]
Follow-up presentation with re-thinking on the same subject.
@zzzcpan Jan 2017 Recommends
on HN thread Inkscape Version 0.92 is Released
Andrew Price explains better in his talk about Blender redesing than I could: [this video] Many things in UX design apply to programming languages as well.
Explains Blender redesign; UX lessons apply to programming languages.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@chestnut-tree Dec 2013 Cites it
on HN thread How Blender started, twenty years ago
Read more
"...the learning curve for modeling is so steep" I agree Blender has an intimidating UI (most 3D apps do). There's been a recent campaign to improve the Blender UI that has (not surprisingly) met with mixed views from the Blender community. In my view, Blender has the same problems with UX as many open source projects: you can't design by committee, but everyone feels they should have a say in the UX. As soon as you create a dedicated team to shape the UX, it creates so much resentment. (Ubuntu is another example of this). Here is a Youtube video of a presentation at this years Blender Conference (Oct 2013) on improving the Blender UI. The Q&A at the end of the session is a bit depressing: the audience seem resistant to change and feel that making Blender easier to use would mean "dumbing down" the app. [this video]
Blender conference UI talk with Q&A showing resistance to change.
@chestnut-tree Feb 2014 Cites it
on HN thread OpenHatch – Find open source projects to contribute to; find mentors
Read more
A good article - thanks for the link. I think user testing is an essential part of making software more usable, but it's not the only aspect of the design process. When it comes to UX, I don't believe you can design by committee, but everyone feels they should have a say in the process (and if you've contributed to the code of a project, you probably feel an even stronger sense of ownership which is perfectly natural and understandable). As soon as someone feels their UX suggestions are ignored, it causes so much resentment. The result is often a distrustful and even resentful relationship between design and development. This is such a familiar scenario in the Open Source community particularly for large Open Source projects. Here's a small example from the Blender community that illustrates the difficulty in reconciling different views about UX. It's a Youtube video of a presentation at the 2013 Blender Conference (Oct 2013) on improving the Blender UI. In the Q&A after the presentation, one audience member (rightfully) says we shouldn't treat users as idiots, but then adds that making Blender easier to use might entail "dumbing down" the app - this elicits a round of applause from the audience. Dependending on your point of view, that's a perfectly legitimate concern or a depressing misunderstanding about ease-of-use: [this video] My impression is that there's a fractious relationship between design/UX and development in the open source community that hasn't changed much over th
Illustrates difficulty reconciling UX views in open source communities.
@greenknight Feb 2016 Cites it
on HN thread Autodesk announces 925 layoffs
Andrew price went on to say that his proposed UI was wrong -- [this video] Since then there has been a UI team, which has tackled the low hanging fruit... the bigger design changes probably will come over the next year or so during their 2.8 revamp... where they tackle the bigger issues with blender.
Presenter later said his proposed UI was wrong.
@greenknight Nov 2016 Cites it
on HN thread Blender 2.8 project status
[link] He followed up with a actual UX designer, who pretty much told him that his proposal was the wrong way to think about it (objectively, not subjectively). He admitted that his proposal at the blender conference was more of a discussion about the way of the future -- [this video] After that, he stopped pushing so hard on the UI/UX problems of blender. I believe he is still part of the UI committee, but isnt pushing it as hard in his podcasts as he realises he doesn't have the answers.
Proposal was a discussion of future direction, not final answer.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close