3 HN users recommended this talk4 months2014–2021score 4
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN points to it in discussions of programming as a creative craft and of how to write clear software.
David Heinemeier Hansson's RailsConf 2014 keynote argues that programming is closer to writing than to science, with clear code produced by iterating through drafts. It prioritizes clarity and craft over technical superiority.
“I really like this[1] talk from DHH on the subject” (HN, 2018)
Many people might have already seen it, but I thought it'd make sense to mention DHH's talk at RailsConf either way. In his talk, he is coining the term "software writer", which goes one step further and motivates a style of programming which prioritizes clarity of code over alleged technical superiority. Very opinionated, but recommended nonetheless: [this video]
Coins software writer, prioritizing code clarity over technical superiority
I don't really see how this would be much more different from language to language. The being 'sick of' part, not so much the specific irritations. Every languages has its issues and from all the languages I have tried I have found Ruby to be the most pleasant to work with, but I am sure this is different from person to person. One of the struggles that the writer seems to have is that programming applications is not science, but he seems to think it is. DHH has a great keynote on this phenomenon: "Writing Software by David Heinemeier Hansson" [this video] As mentioned in the comments of the article you will run into issues with any programming language. One of the tricks is to not hold on so tightly to 'rules'. Like (take from the article) 'break functionality into lots of small objects'. This is horrible advice if applied to all situations. You should only do this when it makes sense. I see so many programmers breaking up everything in useless classes and methods/functions/whatever just because someone wrote a blog post about doing so. This just makes complicated code look simple at a glance, but when you want to find out what the code really does you have to jump up and down through files looking at what each function does, you have to open split screens between abstract classes that have some dedicated piece of code in a class that had to exist in order to satisfy the 'break things up' rule, etc. Long story short: just relax, write code (in whatever language you like, for what
I really like this[1] talk from DHH on the subject, where he talks about the misconception of many programmers that we are doing science rather than something creative. While laced with hyperbolic statements it is at the very least thought provoking on some of the things that we do as developers. 1: [this video]
Programming as creative work, not science; thought provoking
Software is read orders of magnitude more often than it is written. Therefore, the most important thing is to optimise your code for clarity. Software is an interative process. Sometimes it can take 5+ draft versions before you produce high quality code. There a good talk on this topic: Writing Software by David Heinemeier Hansson [1] If you're short on time, you can skip to the highlight here: [2] 1. [this video] 2. [this video]
DHH keynote on writing clear software through iterative drafts
> This brought me back to the time my SO tried to explain an 84 year old lady she was assisting what is it that I do for a living. The consensus was that I'm a writer. Maybe relevant talk from DHH coming to the same conclusion: [this video]
Reaches the same conclusion that programmers are writers
Half true, I guess? I'm definitely in the camp of the CRUD developers. I do accept that I don't do lower level work (even making plugins/affecting how the framework works) in my day to day job. And it's fine. Evidently these skills are worth paying for and create value (monetary or otherwise) in the world. An interesting take on this and the wider topic of how to write software is DHH's keynote from 2014[0]. He states that he himself is more interested in the 'Information System' parts instead of the 'Computer Science' part. I think there's space for more specialized titles to differentiate these jobs/skillsets. 0: [this video]
DHH prefers information systems over computer science
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes
Read more