Cited on HN 3 times, 2023–2025, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN mentions it only in passing, as a reference for instrumented dummy warheads and implosion-test data in nuclear-testing threads.
Scott Manley tells the story of a computerized telemetry system built to sit at the heart of a nuclear test device in place of the plutonium pit, designed to transmit data in the microseconds before it was destroyed.
Politely, this computer exists because the DoE performs stockpile stewardship. Less politely, it exists because of The Bombs. Everything else it will do is a hobby. It is specifically designed for whatever compute needs their classified program has. [link] [link] All of this capital is being spent because the test ban treaty prohibits the detonation of these weapons, but the US stockpile and its efficacy must be maintained and new weapons must be designed. So how do you know if an old weapon or a new design will work or not? Some part of the answer is real data + simulations. Lots and lots of simulations. It's why Frontier exists and why the DoE has pursued exascale compute for quite some time. (as for the real data part, it's why places like the National Ignition Factory exist, and why there's an active experimental program that exists to study dummy warheads in unexpected ways, [this video] )
> undue delay related to aging circuitry So instead of a dumb inert core you use a smart inert core that broadcasts precise measurements of the implosion using fiber optics and triboluminescent capsules that flash as they are crushed. [this video] But yes, I still share your overall concern even if we can push the question marks one step later in the delicate process.
Instrumented inert cores broadcasting implosion data
I wonder what PDC's test and warranty processes are. Hopefully, it's not like this: Customer: "Hello, can you hear me? I'd like a refund in gold or survival meals." Tech support: "Sorry, what?" Customer: "It didn't work!" Tech support: " Did you try turning it on and off again?" Customer: " There's nothing left to reset. There's no plug, button, wire, or electricity, only a smoking crater. But at least it should've last a few milliseconds." [0] Tech support: "I'm afraid I'm going to need a valid serial number, vendor ID, order number, and support contract PIN to proceed providing exceptional service." Customer: "Oh well, corporate tech support flowcharts strike again. It was worth a shot. Go into the wasteland in peace, my friend." 0. The Computer Designed To Die in Milliseconds (yt @scottmanley) [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more