5 HN users recommended this documentary4 months2016–2021score 5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN repeatedly recommends it as an awe-inspiring example of engineering problem solving and the go-to explainer on how Mars landings work.
NASA JPL engineers explain the final minutes of the Curiosity rover's entry, descent and landing on Mars, which combined aerobraking, a parachute and a skycrane. It lays out the tight sequence of events that all had to work automatically.
“If you have not watched the seven minutes of terror video produced by NASA, you absolutely must.” (HN, 2021)
Reminds of the "Seven Minutes of Terror" video that NASA put out ahead of the Curiosity landing explaining how they intended to make it safely to the surface. [this video] (Note: I get goosebumps every time I watch this, absolutely amazing problem solving.)
NASA explains how Curiosity was to land safely on Mars
If you have not watched the seven minutes of terror video produced by NASA, you absolutely must. It details exactly how they put these amazing machines on the surface of Mars. [this video]
Details exactly how machines are put on the surface of Mars
> I still haven't seen any case for visual programming. Aerodef, automotive, etc all use some form of visual programming. Controls engineers rarely write code, the systems are way too complex. E.g. I highly recommend watching this video from JPL to give you an understanding of where such tools excel. It's about simulating, iterating and then having scientists and engineers autogenerate the code they couldn't possibly write or test [this video]
Shows JPL simulating, iterating and autogenerating code for complex systems
Curiosity used aerobraking, parachutes AND a skycrane to land. There's a great video here: [this video] Previous solutions weren't used because they were less crazy, but because they were more mass efficient for "small" payload sizes.
Explains Curiosity's combined aerobraking, parachute and skycrane landing
JPL produced a video titled "7 minutes of terror" that detailed the landing procedure they used for Curiosity, and it's worth a watch. It goes into detail on everything you see in the articles landing video: [this video]
Detailed walkthrough of the Curiosity landing procedure
Surprisingly the wheels only weigh a few pounds each! (I still can't think in metric and I don't have a real number.) They were primarily constrained by packing volume during cruise ( [link] ) and then by shock loads as the securing pyrobolts blew during landing ( [this video] ).
Shows the landing sequence including pyrobolt shock loads
There's a video showing the JWST deployment sequence. It's set to calm orchestral music, and the visuals are just 3D renters of the spacecraft. [link] This video makes me far more nervous than "7 Minutes of Terror", depicting Curiosity's entry/descent/landing sequence. Far more things have to go right in order for JWST to become operational. [this video]
Curiosity entry, descent and landing sequence used as a comparison
Yup. The robotic program has a very good track record of successes, even for crazy stuff like the Mars Science Laboratory’s sky crane descent stage: [this video] It’s the human spaceflight program that has had the, um, difficulties. There are signs of hope, though.
For perceiving the events happening, sure, that was my point. These time differences are nearly always imperceptible but at distances of planets it truly becomes a way of looking into the past. But to be clear, events happen concurrently, eg NASA knew _when_ relative to earth time and _perceived_ events, each stage was "happening" local to Mars vs Earth (assuming it all went well). They made videos about this "7 minutes of terror", I forgot the name of them but linking here [0] [0] [this video]
Illustrates the landing events and Earth-Mars time delay
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
9 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Citations, criticism and jokes