2 HN users recommended this tutorial3 months2021–2025score 3.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN points to it as an unusually clear teaching film on how celestial navigation works, and as an example of how good old military training material is.
A roughly 45-minute vintage US military instructional film that gives a comprehensive overview of celestial navigation, covering sextant use and the theory behind lines of position.
“I love these military training movies, they're so good at teaching complex concepts.” (HN, 2025)
I love these military training movies, they're so good at teaching complex concepts. This one about celestial navigation is really good as well: [this video]
Really good military training film on celestial navigation
> Military solutions will fall back to inertial, celestial or optical guidance, and people using GPS for navigation will at worst show up where they need to be somewhat later than planned. The US Navy re-started celestial navigation a few years ago: * [link] This (1960s?) US government produced (45m) video video gives a pretty good overview: * [this video] For those wanting to invest (substantially) more time, the two videos by "Tippecanoe Boats" are slightly rambling at times, but he does lay things out pretty well by the end of it (second is largely examples): * [link] * [link]
Good overview of celestial navigation from a US government film
Yeah, what is it about these old military materials that makes them so great? They're easy to follow and understand. Here's an old video about celestial navigation: [this video] It feels like we've forgotten how to make videos like these.
Old military material that is easy to follow and understand
> I'd think that the Earth rotating would be obvious much, much sooner […] How exactly could you tell the difference between one moving reference and another? Einstein eventually showed us that it is not possible. As this US Navy video shows, having the Earth stand still and having the 'celestial sphere' move actually makes celestial navigation using a sextant possible / mathematically easy: * [this video] / [link] The Ancients / pre-Moderns concluded that the stars were on one celestial sphere and the wanderers ( planetes in Greek) were on others.
Geocentric celestial sphere makes sextant navigation mathematically easy
Training for this was discontinued, but brought back in 2016: * [link] Now if only the US (and others) would get their act together and build out a backup system to GNSS. China, for example, has built out an eLoran system: * [link] An old USAF video explaining how the theory works (it assumes a geocentric worldview: the Earth is the centre of the universe (but it's not flat :)): * [this video]
Old USAF video on the theory of celestial navigation
> Curious how navigation at night was not possible without expensive equipment, sounds like they were relying only on starts in the morning and evening? As a sibling comment notes, it is possible. There are tables for lunar distance: * [link] * [link] * [link] The planets Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn can be used, as well as several dozen planets (lookup tables in an almanac) * [link] * [link] Two US military videos explaining the theory (ground points/GP, circle of position, etc ): * USAF: [this video] * Army: [link] The USAF has a video because that's how planes used to do navigation outside of radio range—sextants on the ceiling of the cockpit: * [link] * [link]
US military video on the theory of celestial navigation
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Citations, criticism and jokes
Read more