2 HN users recommended this explainer2 months2018–2022score 2
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Linked as the quickest way to grasp the rocket mass heater concept in threads on heating and thermal storage.
A two-minute explanation of what a rocket mass heater is, starting from how a conventional wood stove works and why creosote and chimney fires occur. It shows how burning hot and storing the heat in thermal mass makes for an efficient heater.
“Here's a quick 3 minute video that explains the concept” (HN, 2021)
I wonder what the efficiency is compared to a modern "rocket stove" build [1] Mass rocket stoves are _incredibly_ efficient. So much so that I've always wondered why more similar designs weren't used in times when the primary heat sources were wood, etc. 1 - [this video] (skip to 1:50 if you want to see a full one and not the ms paint diagrams)
Shows a full rocket mass heater and its efficiency.
Best fireplace in terms of efficiency is a rocket mass heater. It burns the wood gas in a secondary burn chamber and then routes the exhaust through a lot of thermal mass. One 2 hour fire a day will usually heat 2000 sq feet of house. 3m video explains the concept; longer videos will better explain it [this video]
Short video explaining the rocket mass heater concept.
You can do a hybrid approach with the hot metal burn chamber for wood gas and earthen materials to slowly radiate the heat. This is called a rocket mass heater. The exhaust temperature is usually below 100C and often smokeless (a complete burn). Using a fan to extract heat from the final vertical stack (pipe around the exhaust with air running by) can give you an exhaust temperature of around 40C. Here's a quick 3 minute video that explains the concept; there's other YouTube videos that go into greater details if you wish to research this topic more. [this video]
Quick three-minute explanation of the rocket mass heater.
The rocket mass heater is the modern replacement for this. [this video] Uses about 1/10th the fuel, and fuel can be wood unusable in other stoves. Very little exhaust / smoke. Super efficient.
Shown as an efficient modern replacement for old stoves.
Quick Video about the rocket mass heater. I'm guessing the cost to heat with wood, would be even lower if your house was built around this. [this video]
Quick intro to rocket mass heaters and cost of heating.
A few things: Clay weighs significantly more than sand. For the same volume of material, clay will store significantly more thermal energy. The big question is- is the hot air on a closed loop or an open loop? I don't know of too many fans comfortable cycling 600C air, which means that you need an open loop of air (fresh air > fan > heater > sand > exhaust). If the sand isn't drawing heat off of the hot air fast enough, the heat won't actually "sink" in through the sand. If we are talking a closed loop of air (fan > heater > sand > fan) then the sand will get fully heated. My reference to "residential" is the aformentioned rocket stove mass heater- see [link] or [this video] and [link] if you prefer videos. These types of things typically stay warm for about 24 hours, so they're burned once a day, maybe once every other day depending on how the house is insulated. Since these are all wood fired, they must be open loop, and sand is almost universally acknowledged as a terrible idea to use for thermal storage.
Cited as residential example of thermal mass heating.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Citations, criticism and jokes
Read more