Cited on HN 5 times, 2014–2020, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited as a vivid example of machines outpacing human reaction times and of high-speed robotic vision.
A University of Tokyo demo of a rock-paper-scissors robot that always wins, using high-speed vision to read the human hand and respond faster than people can perceive.
“It is so fast that unless you are watching it on high-speed film, you can't tell that it is cheating.” (HN, 2015)
The good thing about computers is that they can simulate the future based on current physical data and make decisions in realtime, so if a cyclist fells off on front of it, computer can detect the diversion as it happens, simulate each possible scenario beforehand, and choose the one that has the best outcome. actually it can perform a lot better than humans. look at this unbeatable rock-paper-scissors robot video [this video]
That reminds me of the rock-paper-scissors robot from a while ago that always "wins" by watching the human hand to see what sign they are throwing, then throwing the countersign faster. It is so fast that unless you are watching it on high-speed film, you can't tell that it is cheating. [this video]
Robot reads the hand and counters faster than humans can see
I think a <200lb bipedal 2-arm robot which could box would be a marvel to see, but if there aren't any rules which say how many arms and legs the combatant has to have, the robot is gonna have wheels, most of its mass in the lower body so as to make it un-topplable, be made of some lightweight metal, and have an arm that plays chess and a boxing glove on an actuator that can break concrete. And on the point of existing rules, the existing rules aren't enough for this type of competition. First of all the weight class: are robots men or women? It says age 17+, how does that affect the robot? There's no rule against pouring water on the robot, but there also isn't a rule against releasing nerve gas. My robot is a pourous metal box with a canister of gas which renders everyone unconscious, do I win by K/O? Also, they already have battle robots, and they look nothing like conventional humans (one common design is a flat panel that slides under the opponent and jettisons them) As for reaction speed of man (100+ms vs machine), I'll just link this: [this video]
Perhaps a humorous example of this: a robot that always wins at rock paper scissors: [this video] There's a fun parlor trick which takes advantage of human reaction time too: place a hundred dollar bill on the table, let the other party place their hand a few inches away, start your hand a foot above theirs; the first person to place their hand on the money wins, and the other party can start moving as soon as you start moving. Turns out you can easily go around their hand and grab the bill before they're able to react.
High speed rock paper scissors champ - [this video] Ishikawa Komuro Labs had a bunch of crazy high speed robotic vision and actuation system ~10 years ago. [link] if you watch the slow motion there's so much backlash in the system it's hard to believe it works at all, but somehow they factor all of that in. Crazy stuff. That said, for a little side project this is very cool. The simulation idea is dope and the end result is fun to watch.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
5 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more