1 HN user recommended this explainer1 month2023–2024score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Linked as a concise, accessible rebuttal whenever linguistic relativity comes up in a thread.
Tom Scott, with linguists Gretchen McCulloch and Molly Ruhl, examines whether the language you speak changes how you think. The short answer is mostly no, with caveats about the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
“I recommend this Tom Scott video on the issue” (HN, 2024)
Note that Orwell promotes an hard form of the Sapir Whorf hypothesis called linguistic determinism meaning that a language would make it impossible think certain thoughts. This is obviously wrong. Have you ever experienced anything for which you didn't have the words to explain? This already proves that you can feel and think things that are not easily expressed in the languages you know. Also some people don't even think in words but are more visual thinkers. But even for the softer version, linguistic relativism, these is not much hard evidence. You subjective experience is not easily measurable. Yes, the act of learning new languages can gives you new perspectives and enrich you as a person because it gives you access to a whole new culture but that is different to saying you can suddenly experience new forms of emotions because you didn't have the words for it before or see more colors. I recommend this Tom Scott video on the issue: [this video]
Related video which I just remembered: [this video] So it seems languages might not change how you think, but might be able to emphasize certain aspects of things like you allude to (I believe).
Tom Scott recently did a video about how linguistic relativity (Sapir-Whorf) is almost certainly not true: [this video] It's an alluring idea, but it's been debunked.
Tom Scott arguing linguistic relativity is almost certainly untrue
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes