2 HN users recommended this comedy video2 months2013–2024score 2
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited whenever euphemisms appear in corporate, product or news language, as the classic comedic critique.
A George Carlin stand-up bit from Doin' It Again about soft language and euphemism, showing how softened words hide uncomfortable facts. It touches on topics like shell shock and aging.
“I refer you to George Carlin [1], who explained it better than I could.” (HN, 2013)
For starters, we could all stop calling them car "accidents"... The language we use has a direct affect on the emotions we feel while talking about subjects such as this. Softening our language takes the humanity out of life. I refer you to George Carlin [1], who explained it better than I could. [1] [this video]
Carlin explains how softened language removes humanity from serious subjects.
Humble suggestion: the author should watch George Carlin's skit on "soft language"[1] and reflect. A mature individual can contribute to a company he or she didn't start and still feel a sense of responsibility and ownership without being coddled by language that pretends employees aren't employees, teams have no leaders, and everybody is equally responsible for the success or failure of the business. Frankly, I would probably avoid a company run by a founder who appears to have hang-ups about being an employer and seems reluctant to accept the responsibilities and rewards of leadership. This is about as appealing as going for a ride in a car without a driver. [1] [this video]
Carlin skit on soft language, suggested to an author uneasy with the word employee.
Ah, "pre-owned"... The soft language [0] version of "secondhand". You see, poor people buy secondhand cars and ewww that's icky and definitely not meant for the temporarily embarrassed millionaires looking for a Tesla. [0] [this video]
Cites Carlin's soft language bit for the term pre-owned.
George Carlin also said this: [link] [this video] It's also not always clear cut who is the real underdog and who the gentrified upper middle class finger-pointing comedian who pretends to be the greater person...
Links Carlin as a source for a quote while questioning comedians' pretensions.
Can we all agree that "impacted" is worse than both of those? It provides no clear information about what is actually happening, relying on the entire audience to make the "aha, we're being laid off" connection themselves. "Impacted" appeared five times, "Affected" once, but it was left to the recipients' imaginations to figure out what they were actually being impacted by. Finally, they get around to framing it as "not being offered a role in the new organization"--another euphemism. I mean, it's one thing to soften the message a little when bearing bad news, but "impacted" is softened to the point of uselessness. George Carlin had a bit[1] about this. 1: [this video]
Carlin bit on euphemistic language, applied to corporate layoff wording.
I am frequently reminded of George Carlin's bit about "soft language" and how it obscures facts of life that we're uncomfortable about: [this video] His criticism of soft language about aging and death starts around the 5 minute mark
Carlin on soft language obscuring uncomfortable facts, especially aging and death.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes
Read more