Plays with YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Intel - Anti-Competitive, Anti-Consumer, Anti-Technology.

Name: Intel - Anti-Competitive, Anti-Consumer, Anti-Technology.
Description: AdoredTV's history of Intel's monopolistic behavior over three decades, covering its dealings with AMD and its anti-consumer practices.

AdoredTV Commentary partly dated

Open on YouTube First HN thread

3 HN users recommended this commentary in 3 different months between 2017 and 2023.

2007–2026

3 recommendations 3 citations HackerTube score 3

Recommended as an overview of Intel's anti-competitive past and why it kept dominating despite AMD's competitive products.

AdoredTV's history of Intel's monopolistic behavior over three decades, covering its dealings with AMD and its anti-consumer practices.

Pull quote: “This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years” (HN, 2017)

Also tagged: intel anti-competitive history, intel, amd, monopoly, cpu industry, antitrust

What Hacker News said

6 labeled comments from the HN archive; up to 20 are kept per video, favoring different commenters. Each one links back to the original thread.

Recommends robertelder July 2017 under Samsung ends Intel's 2-decade-plus reign in microchips

Explains how Intel's focus shifted away from better technology.

I watched this video yesterday, and it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years: [this video] I'm not sure how balanced the viewpoint in the video is, but the author comes up with a lot of references.

View on Hacker News

Recommends TheDongIsYou September 2017 under The Huge Premium Intel Is Charging for Skylake Xeons

Overview of Intel's anti-consumer practices over 30 years.

This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years: [this video]

View on Hacker News

Recommends snvzz April 2018 under AMD's Stock Price Jumps on News of Earnings Spurred by Ryzen

Why Intel kept selling despite AMD's performance lead.

I'm not sure what you mean. From the time AMD released the K7 'Athlon' CPU, until the time Intel released Core2, AMD was king of performance. That's a long spawn of time. To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out: [this video]

View on Hacker News

Citations, criticism and jokes

Cites it mkhalil May 2018 under Intel Announces Optane DIMMs

Evidence of Intel's anti-competitive history.

I assume you mean Linus from YouTubes "Linus Tech Tips", and not Linus Torvalds. Surprised you wouldn't clarify that considering what website this is. Considering Intel's history, I wouldn't bet they direct their efforts based on a YouTube reviewer. Also, considering Intels very anti-competitive behavior (e.g [0], [1], [2]), I am wary of stating Intel entering the DDR industry will make it any less corrupt. [0]: [link] [1]: [link] [2]: [this video]

View on Hacker News

Cites it snvzz June 2019 under AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is the fastest processor on Geekbench

Intel's illegal practices held AMD back.

>AMD failed to capture the market despite making tremendous gains and legitimizing itself. Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0]. [0]: [this video]

View on Hacker News

Cites it snvzz August 2023 under Watch out AMD: Intel Arc A580 could be the next great affordable GPU

Reason for disliking Intel.

I'd still just buy the AMD gpu. Mature drivers, and better tested alongside AMD cpus. Also, I never liked Intel[0]. 0. [this video]

View on Hacker News