2 HN users recommended this explainer1 month2022–2023score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited in hydrogen threads as a clear explanation of why burning hydrogen in engines is a poor idea.
Engineering Explained examines BMW's Hydrogen 7, a V12 that burns liquid hydrogen or gasoline. He covers cryogenic storage at -253C and why the approach is impractical.
Maybe, but [link] is probably a better person to ask to explain why this is just not going to work, through his "The Unfortunate Truth About Toyota's Hydrogen V8 Engine" [1] and "BMW's Hydrogen V12 Engine Is A Hilarious Engineering Stunt" [2] videos. [1] [link] [2] [this video]
Explains why hydrogen combustion engines will not work
If batteries has problems as a long term storage, hydrogen is even worse. If you store liquid hydrogen, you have to let the gas escape or risk explosions. Keeping things below -250ºC is not easy. Worth watching: [this video] Every single actor is pushing for their own interests and highlighting the flaws of the competitors. You cannot say in good faith that hydrogen, nuclear or fuel are supporting the "renewable energy gang", or that they are not a gang themselves. In fact, my opinions is that nuclear gang was so against renewables that they missed the bus of "renewables + nuclear" friendly mix, letting the gas gang conquest "renewables + gas".
As a great follow-up, Engineering Explained did a video on BMW's hydrogen car that used liquid Hydrogen. [this video] TL;DW - Liquid hydrogen is an even worse proposition, despite offering greater density than hydrogen gas.
Explains why liquid hydrogen combustion is a bad proposition
There are a few issues with that car. [this video] On the backdrop of the first thing - the part that caught my eye was "Liquid H2 Tank" which... well... yea. That's a different approach than a hydrogen fuel cell.
> There's just no logical reason to try and burn hydrogen in ICE engines. In commenting in another spot - [this video] goes through many of the engineering and practicality reasons behind that.
Engineering reasons against burning hydrogen in engines
Toyota (in collaboration with Yamaha) is developing a V8 hydrogen combustion engine [1]. BMW is also developing a V12 hydrogen combustion engine [2]. "Engineering Explained" has put out videos on both, and neither of them sound very appealing to me. [3][4] [1] [link] [2] [link] [3] [link] [4] [this video]
Yup. BMW made a liquid hydrogen-powered car and the result is...not good. Nothing more than publicity stunt. [this video] The TL;DW is that since you can't keep it cold enough, eventually the liquid starts to convert to gas, pressure builds up in the tank, and a vent is needed to allow the hydrogen gas to escape. Which then poses a problem, since hydrogen gas is VERY explosive, you can't keep this car in your garage. You have to keep it outside. Then of course there's the issue of this comically large tank taking up the enter back of the car.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
8 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes