HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Antique 4x5 camera creates 20 micron photolithography masks: Super tiny tax form Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Antique 4x5 camera creates 20 micron photolithography masks: Super tiny tax form

13 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this tutorial1 month2020–2025 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited as an accessible way to make lithographic masks at home, in threads about hobbyist chip fabrication.

Ben Krasnow of Applied Science uses an antique 4x5 view camera to make high-resolution photolithography masks in a home shop. He photographs a poster-sized printout onto litho film to get features around 20 microns.

“There is a great video on creating lithographic masks on Ben Krasnow's Applied Science channel” (HN, 2025)

1 recommendations · 3 citations · Tutorials · intermediate

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@jcims Apr 2020 Cites it
on HN thread A startup is building computer chips using real neurons
Oops, second vid should be from Ben Krasnow’s (bkraz) Applied Science channel: [this video] Ben explains somewhere in there that this was done to help create a better substrate for the first experiment.
Ben Krasnow makes photolithography masks for a better substrate
@mgdlbp Jul 2022 Cites it
on HN thread Building a Next Level Camera
Read more
Wow, essentially an extraordinarily large view camera built around a repurposed lens, then converted into a depth-of-field adapter[0] in lieu of a digital back. There's actually a known technique for taking wide angle photographs with depth of field this shallow using only a typical long lens:[1] stitching together frames to build a wider field of view is all that's needed; long lenses all have shallow DoF by nature.[a] This interestingly can also be used to explain why the episcope lens has such shallow DoF: its focal length of 432 mm would make it a super telephoto lens, yet its large image circle means it has a wide-angle field of view. If it were replaced by a telephoto lens with the same focal length and aperture but a smaller image circle, and that lens were swung around in a spiral to 'paint' the same area as the episcope lens image circle, the two lenses would produce the same result, only the episcope lens can do it all at once instead of needing multiple exposures. [0] [link] [1] [link] -- [a] Annoyingly, I still don't know a satisfying explanation of why depth of field depends on subject/background distances, aperture, focal length, etc. The formulas exist, but every attempt at intuitive explanation I've seen has been incomplete or incorrect. Here's some videos to show those who say that longer lenses have shallower DoF solely because reframing by standing farther away from the subject causes the background and its blur to become relatively larger: [link] [link] (O

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close